SSRM.SS.5.D
Justify a conclusion with supporting evidence and address counter arguments as appropriate.
Social Studies Research Methods · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2010
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
conclusionsupporting evidencecounter argumentspresentationjustification
Skills
- justify (a conclusion with supporting evidence) #dok2
- address (counter arguments in presentations) #dok2
- analyze (evidence related to conclusions) #dok3
- evaluate (the strength of counter arguments) #dok3
Learning Targets
- I can identify supporting evidence that validates my conclusion. #dok1
- I can recognize counter arguments in social science discussions. #dok1
- I can justify a conclusion by providing relevant supporting evidence. #dok2
- I can address counter arguments effectively in a written or oral presentation. #dok2
- I can analyze the quality of my supporting evidence and counter arguments. #dok3
- I can evaluate the impact of addressing counter arguments on the strength of my argument. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Strong arguments are supported by evidence and thoughtfully consider counter arguments.
- Effectively justifying conclusions and addressing counter arguments are essential for credible social science presentations.
Essential Questions
- Why is it important to justify a conclusion with supporting evidence?
- How can addressing counter arguments improve the quality of a presentation?
- What strategies can be used to identify and effectively address counter arguments?
- How does the use of evidence and acknowledgement of opposing viewpoints influence audience perception?