PHYS.SCI.3.C
Engage respectfully in scientific argumentation using applied scientific explanations and empirical evidence.
Physics · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2022
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
scientific argumentationapplied scientific explanationsempirical evidence
Skills
- engage in scientific argumentation (using scientific explanations and empirical evidence) #dok3
- apply scientific explanations (to support arguments) #dok2
- use empirical evidence (to justify scientific claims) #dok2
- communicate respectfully (in scientific discussions) #dok1
Learning Targets
- I can identify scientific explanations relevant to an argument. #dok1
- I can recognize examples of empirical evidence used in scientific arguments. #dok1
- I can apply scientific explanations to justify my claims in a discussion. #dok2
- I can use empirical evidence to support or refute a scientific claim. #dok2
- I can engage respectfully in a scientific argument by presenting explanations and evidence. #dok3
- I can evaluate differing viewpoints and use evidence to strengthen scientific discussions. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Scientific argumentation relies on evidence and explanations to reach justified conclusions.
- Respectful communication is essential in scientific discussions to evaluate and refine understanding.
Essential Questions
- What is scientific argumentation, and why is it important in science?
- How can empirical evidence be used to support or refute a scientific claim?
- Why is respectful communication crucial during scientific disagreements?
- How do scientific explanations contribute to meaningful scientific discussions?
- In what ways can challenging others' ideas improve our understanding of scientific concepts?