ENVS.SCI.3.C
Engage respectfully in scientific argumentation using applied scientific explanations and empirical evidence.
Environmental Systems · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2022
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
scientific argumentationapplied scientific explanationsempirical evidence
Skills
- engage (in scientific argumentation) #dok3
- use (applied scientific explanations) #dok2
- use (empirical evidence in arguments) #dok2
- communicate (respectfully in scientific discussions) #dok2
Learning Targets
- I can define empirical evidence and scientific explanations. #dok1
- I can identify examples of applied scientific explanations. #dok1
- I can describe what it means to engage in scientific argumentation. #dok1
- I can use scientific explanations to support a claim or argument. #dok2
- I can use empirical evidence to support or refute an argument. #dok2
- I can communicate my argument respectfully in a group discussion. #dok2
- I can engage in scientific argumentation using evidence and explanations. #dok3
- I can critique and respond to others’ arguments using scientific evidence. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Engaging in scientific argumentation is essential for validating and refining explanations in science.
- Using empirical evidence to support arguments fosters critical thinking and effective scientific communication.
Essential Questions
- What does it mean to engage in scientific argumentation?
- Why is empirical evidence important in supporting scientific explanations?
- How can I respectfully challenge or support others’ scientific arguments?
- What strategies can be used to apply scientific explanations when constructing arguments?
- How does the use of evidence and reasoning improve scientific discussions?