ESS.SCI.4.A
Analyze, evaluate, and critique scientific explanations and solutions by using empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and experimental and observational testing, so as to encourage critical thinking by the student.
Earth Systems Science · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2022
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
scientific explanationssolutionsempirical evidencelogical reasoningexperimental testingobservational testingcritical thinking
Skills
- analyze (scientific explanations and solutions) #dok3
- evaluate (scientific explanations and solutions using evidence and reasoning) #dok3
- critique (scientific explanations and solutions for validity and reliability) #dok4
- apply (empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and testing to support conclusions) #dok3
Learning Targets
- I can analyze scientific explanations and solutions by reviewing supporting evidence. #dok3
- I can evaluate scientific explanations and solutions using logical reasoning and evidence. #dok3
- I can critique scientific explanations and solutions based on the strength of empirical evidence and testing. #dok4
- I can apply empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and testing to encourage critical thinking in science. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Scientific explanations and solutions must be evaluated based on evidence, reasoning, and rigorous testing.
- Critical thinking in science involves analyzing, evaluating, and critiquing explanations to reach well-supported conclusions.
Essential Questions
- How can we determine if a scientific explanation is reliable and valid?
- What role does empirical evidence play in supporting scientific explanations?
- How do logical reasoning and testing strengthen or weaken scientific solutions?
- Why is it important to critique scientific explanations and encourage critical thinking?
- What processes do scientists use to evaluate the validity of scientific claims?