CHEM.SCI.4.A
Analyze, evaluate, and critique scientific explanations and solutions by using empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and experimental and observational testing, so as to encourage critical thinking by the student.
Chemistry · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2022
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
scientific explanationssolutionsempirical evidencelogical reasoningexperimental testingobservational testingcritical thinkingstudent
Skills
- analyze (scientific explanations and solutions) #dok3
- evaluate (scientific explanations and solutions using evidence and reasoning) #dok3
- critique (scientific explanations and solutions using testing and reasoning) #dok3
- encourage (critical thinking through analysis, evaluation, and critique) #dok4
Learning Targets
- I can analyze scientific explanations and solutions by breaking them down into their main components. #dok3
- I can evaluate scientific explanations and solutions using empirical evidence and logical reasoning. #dok3
- I can critique scientific explanations and solutions by identifying strengths and weaknesses based on experimental and observational testing. #dok3
- I can encourage critical thinking in myself and others by thoughtfully assessing scientific explanations and solutions. #dok4
Big Ideas
- Scientific explanations and solutions must be supported by evidence and logical reasoning.
- Critically analyzing, evaluating, and critiquing scientific explanations fosters deeper scientific understanding and critical thinking.
Essential Questions
- How do we determine if a scientific explanation or solution is valid?
- What role does empirical evidence play in evaluating scientific explanations?
- How can logical reasoning and experimental testing help us critique scientific ideas?
- Why is it important to encourage critical thinking when reviewing scientific explanations?
- How can students develop their ability to analyze and evaluate scientific explanations?