BIO.SCI.3.C
Engage respectfully in scientific argumentation using applied scientific explanations and empirical evidence.
Biology · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2022
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
scientific argumentationapplied scientific explanationsempirical evidence
Skills
- engage (respectfully in scientific argumentation) #dok3
- use (applied scientific explanations) #dok2
- use (empirical evidence in arguments) #dok2
- communicate (scientific arguments respectfully) #dok3
Learning Targets
- I can define empirical evidence and applied scientific explanations. #dok1
- I can recognize respectful communication in scientific discussions. #dok1
- I can use applied scientific explanations to support an argument. #dok2
- I can use empirical evidence in a scientific argument. #dok2
- I can analyze scientific claims to determine if they are supported by evidence. #dok3
- I can engage respectfully in scientific argumentation using appropriate evidence and explanations. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Respectful argumentation and use of evidence are essential for scientific understanding and communication.
- Scientific arguments rely on both empirical evidence and coherent explanations to advance knowledge.
Essential Questions
- What does it mean to engage respectfully in scientific argumentation?
- How do scientists use empirical evidence to support their claims?
- Why is it important to use applied scientific explanations in an argument?
- How can you distinguish between a strong and weak scientific argument?
- What role does respectful communication play in scientific discussions?