AQS.SCI.3.C
Engage respectfully in scientific argumentation using applied scientific explanations and empirical evidence.
Aquatic Science · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2022
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
scientific argumentationapplied scientific explanationsempirical evidence
Skills
- engage (in scientific argumentation) #dok3
- apply (scientific explanations in discussions) #dok3
- use (empirical evidence to support arguments) #dok3
- communicate (respectfully during scientific debates) #dok2
Learning Targets
- I can identify what makes an argument scientific using examples. #dok1
- I can recognize empirical evidence in explanations and arguments. #dok1
- I can explain the importance of respect during scientific argumentation. #dok1
- I can compare strong and weak scientific arguments in group settings. #dok2
- I can construct a scientific argument that uses empirical evidence. #dok3
- I can respectfully participate in scientific argumentation with my peers. #dok3
- I can apply scientific explanations during a collaborative discussion. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Scientific argumentation relies on respectfully using data and evidence to explain or challenge scientific ideas.
- Empirical evidence is a cornerstone in supporting or refuting scientific explanations within collaborative discourse.
Essential Questions
- What does it mean to participate respectfully in scientific argumentation?
- How does empirical evidence strengthen a scientific explanation?
- Why is respectful communication important when discussing scientific ideas?
- How can we distinguish between opinions and scientific arguments?
- In what ways can using evidence change the outcome of a scientific debate?