ENG3.ELAR.5.I
Reflect on and adjust responses when valid evidence warrants.
English III · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2017
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
responseevidenceauthors' claims
Skills
- reflect (on responses) #dok2
- adjust (responses) #dok3
- evaluate (validity of evidence) #dok3
Learning Targets
- I can reflect on my response to an author's claims. #dok2
- I can determine when evidence requires me to reconsider my response. #dok3
- I can revise my response after evaluating new or valid evidence. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Strong analytical responses are built on valid evidence and can be changed or strengthened as needed.
- Critical thinkers are willing to reconsider or alter their positions when presented with compelling new evidence.
Essential Questions
- How do I know when my response to an author's claim needs to be revised?
- Why is it important to adjust my response when presented with valid evidence?
- What strategies can I use to evaluate the validity of new evidence?
- How can reflecting on my original response improve my understanding of the text?
- What might happen if I ignore valid evidence when responding to an author's claim?