Standard Unwrapping

AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.
Vocabulary
authors' claimsrelevant text evidence
Skills
  • defend (authors' claims using relevant text evidence) #dok3
  • challenge (authors' claims using relevant text evidence) #dok3
  • analyze (text evidence as it relates to an author's claim) #dok3
  • evaluate (the validity of an author's claim based on evidence) #dok3
Learning Targets
  • I can identify the author’s claim within a text. #dok1
  • I can locate evidence in the text that supports or challenges an author's claim. #dok1
  • I can explain the reasoning behind an author’s claim using supporting details. #dok2
  • I can distinguish between strong and weak evidence in support of an author’s claim. #dok2
  • I can defend an author's claim using relevant text evidence. #dok3
  • I can challenge an author's claim by providing counterarguments supported with text evidence. #dok3
  • I can synthesize various pieces of evidence to build a convincing defense or challenge of an author's claim. #dok4
Big Ideas
  • Critical analysis of an author’s claim requires using relevant evidence from the text.
  • Readers can strengthen or challenge arguments by referencing and evaluating text evidence.
Essential Questions
  • What strategies help us identify an author's claim in a text?
  • How can we determine whether evidence is relevant and sufficient to support a claim?
  • What is the difference between defending and challenging an author’s claim?
  • How does using text evidence strengthen our arguments about a text?
  • Why is it important to consider multiple perspectives when analyzing an author's claim?