D.ELAR.4.A
Evaluate implications of stock issues in affirmative and negative case construction and refutation.
Debate I, II, III (One to Three Credits). · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2017
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
implicationsstock issuesaffirmative case constructionnegative case constructionrefutation
Skills
- evaluate (implications of stock issues in case construction and refutation) #dok3
- analyze (stock issues in affirmative and negative cases) #dok3
- construct (affirmative and negative cases using stock issues) #dok3
- refute (arguments based on analysis of stock issues) #dok3
Learning Targets
- I can describe the concept of stock issues in debate. #dok1
- I can identify stock issues present in policy debate cases. #dok1
- I can explain how stock issues influence case construction. #dok2
- I can distinguish between the use of stock issues in affirmative and negative cases. #dok2
- I can analyze the implications of stock issues when building an argument. #dok3
- I can evaluate how addressing stock issues can strengthen or weaken a case during refutation. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Understanding and employing stock issues is fundamental to effective policy debate case construction and refutation.
- Evaluating how stock issues are addressed in both affirmative and negative cases reveals the strengths and weaknesses of arguments.
Essential Questions
- What are the key stock issues in policy debate, and why are they important?
- How do affirmative and negative teams address stock issues differently in case construction?
- In what ways do implications of stock issues influence the effectiveness of refutation?
- How can a strong understanding of stock issues improve debate strategy?
- What are the consequences of failing to address specific stock issues in a debate case?