D.ELAR.3.F
Develop and use valid approaches to construct affirmative and negative cases.
Debate I, II, III (One to Three Credits). · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2017
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
valid approachesaffirmative casesnegative casespropositions of valueconstruction
Skills
- develop (valid approaches to case construction) #dok3
- use (valid approaches in argumentation) #dok2
- construct (affirmative cases for propositions of value) #dok3
- construct (negative cases for propositions of value) #dok3
Learning Targets
- I can identify valid approaches to constructing cases in value debate. #dok1
- I can use valid approaches to develop arguments in value debate. #dok2
- I can construct an affirmative case for a proposition of value using valid approaches. #dok3
- I can construct a negative case for a proposition of value using valid approaches. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Constructing effective affirmative and negative cases for propositions of value requires understanding and applying valid approaches.
- The development and selection of valid argumentative strategies influences the strength and clarity of value debate cases.
Essential Questions
- What makes an approach to case construction valid in a value debate?
- How do valid approaches differ for affirmative and negative cases in value debates?
- Why is it important to use valid approaches when developing cases for propositions of value?
- How can you determine which approaches best support your position in a value debate?
- In what ways can the use of invalid approaches weaken an argument in a value debate?