D.ELAR.3.E
Apply value assumptions and/or classical and contemporary philosophies appropriately in formulating arguments.
Debate I, II, III (One to Three Credits). · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2017
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
value assumptionsclassical philosophiescontemporary philosophiesarguments
Skills
- apply (value assumptions in formulating arguments) #dok3
- apply (classical philosophies in formulating arguments) #dok3
- apply (contemporary philosophies in formulating arguments) #dok3
- use (philosophical frameworks appropriately in debate) #dok3
Learning Targets
- I can identify classical and contemporary philosophies relevant to debate topics. #dok1
- I can explain value assumptions that underpin arguments. #dok2
- I can select appropriate value assumptions and philosophies for specific arguments. #dok2
- I can apply value assumptions in formulating coherent and persuasive arguments. #dok3
- I can integrate philosophical frameworks (classical and contemporary) into the construction of arguments. #dok3
- I can justify my selection and use of particular philosophies and value assumptions in debate. #dok4
Big Ideas
- Philosophical viewpoints and value assumptions form the backbone of strong, persuasive debate arguments.
- Integrating appropriate classical and contemporary philosophies enhances the quality and depth of debate.
Essential Questions
- What role do value assumptions and philosophies play in argumentation?
- How do classical and contemporary philosophies influence the formation of arguments in debate?
- In what ways can selecting the right value assumptions strengthen your case?
- What criteria should be used to determine if a philosophical perspective is appropriate for your argument?
- How can debaters effectively justify their use of specific philosophies or value assumptions?