D.ELAR.10.B
Provide valid and constructive written and/or oral critiques of debates.
Debate I, II, III (One to Three Credits). · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2017
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
knowledge of debate principlesevaluation standardsdebate formatswritten critiqueoral critiquedebates
Skills
- provide (valid critiques of debates) #dok3
- provide (constructive critiques of debates) #dok3
- distinguish (between valid and invalid critique) #dok2
- justify (feedback using debate principles) #dok3
Learning Targets
- I can identify key debate principles used in evaluating debates. #dok1
- I can explain what makes a critique valid and constructive. #dok2
- I can distinguish between weak and strong debate critiques. #dok2
- I can provide a valid and constructive written critique of a debate. #dok3
- I can provide a valid and constructive oral critique of a debate. #dok3
- I can justify my feedback using evidence from the debate. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Effective critique of debates fosters growth and improvement in argumentation skills.
- Using established debate principles ensures that feedback is objective, valid, and constructive.
Essential Questions
- What makes a critique of a debate valid and constructive?
- How can I use debate principles to evaluate the quality of a debate?
- Why is it important to provide both written and oral critiques in debate?
- What strategies can be used to ensure feedback is constructive and fosters improvement?
- How does giving and receiving feedback impact the process of debating?