D.ELAR.10.A
Use a knowledge of debate principles to develop and apply evaluation standards for various debate formats.
Debate I, II, III (One to Three Credits). · Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) · TEKS 2017
Standard Unwrapping
AI-generated as a starting point — sign in to edit.Vocabulary
knowledge of debate principlesevaluation standardsdebate formats
Skills
- apply (knowledge of debate principles to new contexts) #dok3
- develop (evaluation standards for debate formats) #dok4
- evaluate (debate formats using established standards) #dok3
Learning Targets
- I can identify the core principles that govern effective debates. #dok1
- I can describe different types of debate formats. #dok1
- I can explain how debate principles influence evaluation criteria. #dok2
- I can compare evaluation standards across various debate formats. #dok2
- I can develop original evaluation standards for a specific debate format. #dok4
- I can apply my knowledge of debate principles to create appropriate evaluation standards for new or unfamiliar debate formats. #dok3
- I can evaluate debates using the standards I have developed. #dok3
Big Ideas
- Evaluation of debates requires a deep understanding of debate principles and how they inform fair and effective assessment.
- Debate formats vary widely; therefore, evaluation standards must be adaptable and comprehensive to ensure equitable judging.
Essential Questions
- What core principles form the foundation of effective debates?
- Why is it important to develop clear and fair evaluation standards for debates?
- How do the requirements for evaluating debates change based on different debate formats?
- In what ways can a judge's understanding of debate principles influence their assessments?
- How can evaluation standards promote fairness and quality in competitive and academic debates?